雨果巴拉:行业北极星Vision Pro过度设计不适合市场

Multidimensional Evaluation of Virtual Reality Paradigms in Clinical Neuropsychology: Application of the VR-Check Framework

Note: We don't have the ability to review paper

PubDate: April 2020

Teams: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin;Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin;Max-Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences;University Hospital Leipzig;Heinrich Hertz Institute;Hochschule der Bildenden Künste Saar;University of York

Writers: Stephan Krohn1,2, MD, PhD ; Johanne Tromp2,3, PhD ; Eva M Quinque3,4, PhD ; Julia Belger3,4, MSc ; Felix Klotzsche2,3, MSc ; Sophia Rekers1,2, MSc ; Paul Chojecki5, Dipl-Psych ; Jeroen de Mooij3,4, BSc ; Mert Akbal2,3,6, Dip Arts ; Cade McCall7, PhD ; Arno Villringer2,3,4, MD, PhD ; Michael Gaebler2,3*, PhD ; Carsten Finke1,2*, MD, PhD ; Angelika Thöne-Otto3,4*, PhD

PDF: Multidimensional Evaluation of Virtual Reality Paradigms in Clinical Neuropsychology: Application of the VR-Check Framework

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) represents a key technology of the 21st century, attracting substantial interest from a wide range of scientific disciplines. With regard to clinical neuropsychology, a multitude of new VR applications are being developed to overcome the limitations of classical paradigms. Consequently, researchers increasingly face the challenge of systematically evaluating the characteristics and quality of VR applications to design the optimal paradigm for their specific research question and study population. However, the multifaceted character of contemporary VR is not adequately captured by the traditional quality criteria (ie, objectivity, reliability, validity), highlighting the need for an extended paradigm evaluation framework. To address this gap, we propose a multidimensional evaluation framework for VR applications in clinical neuropsychology, summarized as an easy-to-use checklist (VR-Check). This framework rests on 10 main evaluation dimensions encompassing cognitive domain specificity, ecological relevance, technical feasibility, user feasibility, user motivation, task adaptability, performance quantification, immersive capacities, training feasibility, and predictable pitfalls. We show how VR-Check enables systematic and comparative paradigm optimization by illustrating its application in an exemplary research project on the assessment of spatial cognition and executive functions with immersive VR. This application furthermore demonstrates how the framework allows researchers to identify across-domain trade-offs, makes deliberate design decisions explicit, and optimizes the allocation of study resources. Complementing recent approaches to standardize clinical VR studies, the VR-Check framework enables systematic and project-specific paradigm optimization for behavioral and cognitive research in neuropsychology.

您可能还喜欢...

Paper